SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1544

SANJIV KHANNA, REKHA PALLI
PANKAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal with Ms. Debashree Mukherjee.
For the Respondents: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj with Mr. Jitendra K. Tripathi.

JUDGMENT :

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

1. The petitioner-Pankaj Kumar, an OBC candidate and domicile of the state of Bihar, had participated in the selection process conducted by Staff Selection Commission in 2012 for appointment to the post of Constable (General Duty) in Central Armed Police Forces and Rifleman (General Duty) in Assam Rifles.

2. The petitioner had, admittedly, not given option in his application form as to which Central Armed Police Force i.e. Border Security Force; Central Industrial Security Force; Central Reserve Police Force; Sashastra Seema Bal or alternatively the Assam Rifles, he would opt to join.

3. The petitioner having secured 61 marks, was not appointed. He has preferred this petition, inter-alia, on the ground that some of the selected candidates had secured less marks.

4. In the present case, the petitioner had left the option column blank and not indicated preference for any of the Central Police Organisations. His case, therefore, was to be considered in the Reserve List-I after accommodating the candidates who had opted for the specified Forces. The selectio























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top