INDERMEET KAUR
SIDDHANT GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Respondent
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
1. Petitioner had qualified his 12th class from the Delhi Public School, Rohini. He had secured 87 % marks. He was a national level Archer. He has been winning medals at the State level as also at the National level.
2. Respondent No. 1/University of Delhi had issued a notification for admission in the various colleges for the academic session 2017-18 which included a sports quota.
3. On 12.06.2017 petitioner had filled up his form; he had been issued a receipt acknowledging his successful Under Graduate Admission for the year 2017-18.
4. Petitioner also checked on the online website of the respondent as to whether his form had been considered under the sport quota (which he had filled). As per the details checked as on 27.06.2017 the petitioner had been given 32 marks for his sports certificate. Copy of the print out of the aforenoted information was received by the petitioner.
5. Respondent No. 1 issued a list of eligible candidates for giving trials under the various sports quota. Petitioner’s name figured as an eligible candidate under the sport “A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.