SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3207

INDERMEET KAUR
SIDDHANT GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jinendra Jain and Mr. Brijesh Yadav, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1. Petitioner had qualified his 12th class from the Delhi Public School, Rohini. He had secured 87 % marks. He was a national level Archer. He has been winning medals at the State level as also at the National level.

2. Respondent No. 1/University of Delhi had issued a notification for admission in the various colleges for the academic session 2017-18 which included a sports quota.

3. On 12.06.2017 petitioner had filled up his form; he had been issued a receipt acknowledging his successful Under Graduate Admission for the year 2017-18.

4. Petitioner also checked on the online website of the respondent as to whether his form had been considered under the sport quota (which he had filled). As per the details checked as on 27.06.2017 the petitioner had been given 32 marks for his sports certificate. Copy of the print out of the aforenoted information was received by the petitioner.

5. Respondent No. 1 issued a list of eligible candidates for giving trials under the various sports quota. Petitioner’s name figured as an eligible candidate under the sport “A


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top