C. Hari Shankar, J.

1. This application, preferred by Mr. Khosla/respondent no.2, prays for a direction that the proceedings of the court be video recorded or at least audio recorded or “in the lesser preferred alternative”, that the entire hearing be transcribed by multiple court stenographers, at the expense of the applicant.

2. Mr. Khosla, who appears in person, advanced lengthy arguments on the above application, on 11th July 2017. Pursuant to conclusion of the arguments, vide order passed on the said date, the application was dismissed, for reasons to be stated separately.

3. This order proceeds to record the reasons for dismissing the aforementioned application.

4. Paras 4 to 7, and 13 to 16 of the application, which purport to set out the justification, for the prayers contained therein, read as under:

“4. That it is most humbly submitted that parties resorting to wayward conduct(such as filing false affidavits, filing forged documents, etcetera), itself, is bad enough; but when the “rot” spread to counsels acting in the matter, the manner in which proceedings are conducted has to change, so that no party can claim that benevolence has been shown by the Hon’ble Court to an