SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3092

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
PNB Housing Finance Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Akhilesh Chandra & Ors. - Respondents
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 411 of 2016
Decided On : 24-08-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Uppal
For the Respondents: Mr. L.B. Rai

The court applied the principles of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act to protect the interests of the finance company and maintain the status quo of the property during arbitration.

Headnote:

Arbitration & Conciliation Act - Loan Agreement - Equitable Mortgage

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a finance company, disbursed a loan secured by an equitable mortgage for the purchase of a property. The respondent defaulted on the loan, leading to foreclosure and recall of the loan facility.

Finding of the Court:

The court restrained the respondent from transferring or encumbering the property until the arbitration proceedings are concluded.

Issues: Breach of loan agreement, foreclosure of loan facility, arbitration proceedings

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the existence of the loan agreement, default by the respondent, and the ongoing arbitration proceedings.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the restraint on property transfer until the arbitration proceedings are completed.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The petitioner is a finance company rendering financial/credit facility in the form of loans.

3. As per the petitioner the respondent had availed a loan for purchase of property bearing No. E-2, INST-5 Amarpali Yojana, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226001.

4. A loan in the sum of Rs. 1,02,94,081/- was disbursed to the respondent. The loan was secured by creation of an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds of the above referred property with the petitioner.

5. As per the petitioner, respondents committed breach of the loan agreement and defaulted in making the payment. The petitioner has foreclosed/recalled the loan facility granted to the respondents vide its notice dated 05.10.2016.

6. By order dated 21.10.2016, the respondents was restrained from transferring, selling, alienating, encumbering or creating any third party interest in any manner, in respect of the property bearing No. E-2, INST-5 Amarpali Yojana, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226001.

7. No reply has been filed by the Respondent. There is no denial to the factum of availing of the loan facility and the creation of equitable mortgage by the respondents. There is also no denial of the foreclosure and recall of the loan facility.

8. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the arbitration proceedings have already commenced.

9. In view of the above, till the disposal of the arbitration proceedings, the respondents are restrained from transferring, selling, alienating, encumbering or creating any third party interest in any manner, in respect of the property bearing No. E-2, INST-5 Amarpali Yojana, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226001.

10. The petition is disposed of in above terms.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top