SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2788

VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sumit Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ajesh Luthra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition assailing the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 215/2017 preferred by the respondent Mr. Sumit Kumar. The Tribunal has allowed the said OA along with two others, since the Tribunal considered that the issue arising in the said OAs was, more or less, the same.

2. The respondent/applicant was a candidate for Combined Higher Secondary Level (10+2) Examination, 2015 held for filling up various posts under the Union of India. He applied under the OBC category. Written Examination Paper-I was conducted on 06.12.2015 wherein the Respondent participated. On 29.07.2016, result of this examination was published and he was shown as qualified for the descriptive type Paper-II. On 31.08.2016, the marks list was published in respect of the Paper-I examination in which the Respondent was shown to have secured 137 marks-which was more than the cut off marks, i.e. 119 for unreserved category, and 110 marks for the OBC category. He participated in the Paper-II examination held on 18.09.2016. However, the Respondent’s candidature was rejected. This was done on the ground that on




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top