SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1633

VINOD GOEL
SHITAL PRASHAD KALRA – Appellant
Versus
NARESH BAHADUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ashwani Bharadwaj, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Tarun Jaitley, Adv. with Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VINOD GOEL, J.

1. Challenge in this appeal is judgment and decree dated 6th April, 2015 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge-II, Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi, by which the suit of the appellant for recovery of Rs.10,19,200/- was dismissed.

2. The respondent No.2 is the sister of the wife of the appellant/plaintiff and respondent No.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2. Respondent No.3 is the foster sister of the respondents No.1 and 2. It is alleged that on persuasion of respondents No.1 and 2, the appellant deposited a sum of 1,49,000/- on various dates in the bank account No.10001952591, State Bank of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi, of respondent No.1/defendant No.1. The details of the same are as under :

14.05.2010

Rs.24,000/-

17.05.2010

Rs.25,000/-

18.05.2010

Rs.25,000/-

19.05.2010

Rs.25,000/-

20.05.2010

Rs.25,000/-

21.05.2010

Rs.25,000/-

3. The appellant had also deposited a sum of Rs.2,21,000/- on various dates in the bank account of proprietor firm of respondent No.1 i.e. M/s Universal Infrastructure Phase-II, Mohali, be

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top