SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2462

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
NASEEMA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
MOHD JAVED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Brahm S. Nagar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Appl. No. 26262/2017 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

RSA No. 191/2017

1. By this Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) the defendant in the suit impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 26.10.2012 and the first appellate court dated 27.2.2017; whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs for injunction has been partly decreed and the appellant/defendant has been restrained from selling, alienating or creating third party interest in the first floor of the suit property. Rights were claimed by the respondents/plaintiffs in both first and second floors. The number of the suit property as per the plaint is the property 7503-7506, Kasabpura, Sadar Bazar, Delhi. The disputed portion is shown in red colour in the site plan. Respondents/plaintiffs claimed ownership of the suit property in terms of a registered Gift Deed dated 11.6.1973 executed by the erstwhile owner Mohd. Yasin in favour of the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents/plaintiffs Mohd. Ismail. Mohd. Ismail was the father of the re

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top