VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ROHTAK ROAD TRANSPORT CENTRE WORKERS ASSOCIATION (REGD. ) – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 6.3.2017 by which the first appellate court accepted the appeal filed by the defendant in the suit and set aside the judgment of the Trial Court dated 24.11.2015 by which the trial court while dismissing the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for one relief of grant of alternative allotment however decreed the suit for the second relief that the members of the appellant/plaintiff association should not be dispossessed without due process of law from their portions which they are occupying in DDA Parking, Rohtak Road Transport Centre, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi-35. I may note that the appellant/plaintiff did not file any appeal against the judgment of the trial court dated 24.11.2015 by which the trial court dismissed the suit by refusing to grant the prayer for alternative plots being granted to the members of the appellant/plaintiff.
2. The first appellate court by its impugned judgment has thoroughly examined the issue with respect to the claim of the appellant/plaintiff that the
Rame Gowda (D) by Lrs vs M. Varadappa Naidu (D) by Lrs. & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.