SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
G.K. Burman Herbal (India) Pvt. Ltd. - Plaintiff
Versus
Zee Hygiene Products Pvt. Ltd. - Defendant
CS (OS) No. 2467 of 2012
Decided On : 10-07-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Ankit Sahni.
For the Defendant : Mr. N. Mahabir.

The court's decision was based on the acceptance of the settlement terms, which included the defendant's agreement to change the packaging and refrain from infringing the plaintiff's Trade Mark and Copyright.

Headnote:

Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Copyright Act, 1957 - Settlement of dispute

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Trade Mark, Copyright, and Damages under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957. The parties settled their disputes and filed an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court accepted the settlement terms and decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the settlement.

Issues: Settlement of dispute, infringement of Trade Mark and Copyright

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the settlement terms, wherein the defendant agreed to change the entire packaging of its product and refrain from using deceptively similar packaging or labels to the plaintiff's.

Final Decision: The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the settlement.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

IA No. 7358/2017(XXIII R.3 CPC)

1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit under Sections 28 & 29 read with Sections 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Sections 51 & 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Trade Mark, Copyright, Damages etc.

2. The parties have settled their disputes. Accordingly, the present application under Order XXIII R.3 CPC has been filed.

3. The application is signed by the authorized representatives of the parties and their counsel and is supported by an affidavit of the respective Directors of the plaintiff as well as defendant Companies. The application is marked Exhibit C-1.

4. The application is allowed.

CS (OS) No. 2467/2012

1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit under Sections 28 & 29 read with Sections 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Sections 51 & 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Trade Mark, Copyright, Damages etc.

2. The plaintiff claims to be the proprietor of the trade mark ‘HIMGANGE’ Ayurvedic Oil having adopted the mark in the year 1986.

3. The plaintiff has filed the suit contending that the Defendant is infringing its registered trademark and the copyright.

4. The parties have arrived at a settlement with the plaintiff. Terms of the Settlement are as under:-

“3. The Defendant admits that the trade mark HIMGANGE (word per se) and HIMGANGE (Label) are the registered trademarks of the Plaintiff in relation to Ayurvedic hair oil, besides for other goods, and that the Plaintiff is both the statutory as well as common law owner in relation to the Himgange word mark and Himgange Label.

4. That the Defendant admits that the Plaintiff is owner/proprietor of the artistic work HIMGANGE (Label) which is registered under registration No. A70781/05 of the Copyright Act.

5. The Defendant also admits that the Plaintiff is the owner of Copyright in the inside of the carton, the packaging material and instructions for use of the Himgange product of the Plaintiff, as more further detailed in paragraph 5, 6 and 7 of the Plaint.

6. The Defendant also admits that the Plaintiff is the owner of the Design of the bottle registered under Registration No. 196282 under the Designs Act.

7. The Defendant undertakes to this Hon'ble Court that they will not use the labels, sachet/pouch, bottle, packing carton/packing material and outer carton which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs label, sachet/pouch, bottle, outer carton/packing material amounting to infringement of trademark, copyright, design and passing off their goods as the goods of the Plaintiff.

8. The Defendant shall not manufacture and sell the products bearing a label deceptively similar or identical to the label of the Plaintiff as well as adopting a layout and get up similar to the artistic features of the Plaintiffs carton, literary works of the Plaintiff as well as bottles that are similar to the registered design of the Plaintiffs bottle. The Defendant shall inform all its distributors to return all infringing stock (if any) within a week of the present settlement and shall hand over all existing stock (if any) to the Plaintiff for destruction within two month of the present settlement. The Defendant further undertake not to oppose or seek a rectification in relation to any of the rights of the Plaintiff.

9. The Defendant has agreed to change the entire packaging of its product (including shape/design of the bottle) under the trade mark HIMGURU, as per ANNEXURE-l, attached to this term of settlement which forms integral part hereof. The Plaintiff consents to this Annexure - 1.

10. The Defendant undertakes that the new packaging developed as annexed hereto, will not be amended as to presentation of trade mark, artistic work, devices, layout. color scheme shown therein, In case, any amendment/change is made, such change shall not effect the style of writing of the trade mark HIMGURU and substantial representation of the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top