SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2032

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
PNB Housing Finance Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Liladhar Jagganath Warade and Another - Respondents
O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) No. 99 of 2017
Decided On : 05-07-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Uppal with Mr. Kanishk Arora.

The court's decision highlights the importance of compliance with repayment schedules and the invocation of arbitration clauses in loan agreements, leading to the grant of interim measures under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Interim Measures - Restraining Order

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a finance company, granted a loan secured by an equitable mortgage for the purchase of a property. The respondents breached the repayment schedule, and the petitioner recalled the loan facility and invoked the arbitration clause.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondents had breached the repayment schedule and had not appeared to defend the petition, leading to the interim order being made absolute.

Issues: Breach of repayment schedule, invocation of arbitration clause, interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the breach of repayment schedule and the absence of the respondents to defend the petition, leading to the grant of interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and restrained the respondents from transferring, selling, encumbering, or creating any third party interest in the properties specified. The petitioner was directed to ensure compliance with the provisions of Section 9(2) of the Act.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. This is a petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The respondents have been served. None appears for the respondents.

3. The petitioner is a finance company rendering financial/credit facilities in the form of loans.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents had approached the petitioner for seeking financial assistance for purchase of Flat No. 1202, Tower No. 23, 12th Floor, Lodha Belmondo, Gahunje, Pune, Maharastra-412101.

5. A loan in the sum of Rs. 4 crores was sanctioned vide Loan Agreement dated 28.03.2014. Loan amount of Rs. 2,92,25,091/- was partly disbursed to the respondents.

6. The loan was secured by creation of an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds of the above referred flats in favour of the petitioner.

7. Since the project is still under construction, the balance sanctioned loan amount has not been disbursed and interest is being charged only on the amount that has been disbursed as per the agreed terms.

8. The respondents are alleged to have breached the repayment schedule and, accordingly, the petitioner has recalled/foreclosed the loan facility granted to the respondents by its notice dated 14.02.2017.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arbitration clause has already been invoked.

10. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act seeks interim measures of protection in the form of a restraint on the respondents from disposing of, selling, alienating, transferring or creating any encumbrance, charge or third party interest, in any manner, whatsoever, in respect of Flat No. 1202, Tower No. 23, 12th Floor, Lodha Belmondo, Gahunje, Pune, Maharastra-412101.

11. By order dated 02.03.2017, this Court had restrained the respondents from transferring, selling, encumbering or in any manner alienating the property bearing No. 1202, Tower No. 23, 12th Floor, Lodha Belmondo, Gahunje, Pune, Maharastra-412101 and Saptasatij Metatech Pvt. Ltd. Survey No. 879, Siddivinayak Industrial Estate, Near Maharashtra Weight Bridge, Kudalwadi, Chikhali, Pune, Maharashtra-412114.

12. None has appeared for the respondents to defend the petition despite service. There is no rebuttal to the case set up by the petitioner. The interim order dated 02.03.2017 is liable to be made absolute.

13. The petition is, accordingly allowed. The respondents are hereby restrained from transferring, selling, encumbering or, in any manner, alienating or creating any third party interest in respect of property bearing No. 1202, Tower No.23, 12th Floor, Lodha Belmondo, Gahunje, Pune, Maharastra-412101 and Saptasatij Metatech Pvt. Ltd. Survey No. 879, Siddivinayak Industrial Estate, Near Maharashtra Weight Bridge, Kudalwadi, Chikhali, Pune, Maharashtra-412114.

14. The petitioner shall take appropriate steps to ensure compliance of the provisions of section 9(2) of the Act

15. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top