VIBHU BAKHRU
Anjali Seth – Appellant
Versus
Central Information Commission – Respondent
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
1. None for the respondents. Notice in this petition was issued on 29.05.2015 and four weeks” time was granted to the respondents to file the counter affidavit. On 06.05.2016, a final opportunity was granted to the respondents to file the counter affidavit within a period of one week from that date and it was clarified that failing the same, their right to file the counter affidavit would stand closed. However despite sufficient time, no such counter affidavit was filed to oppose the present petition. In the circumstances, this Court did not consider it apposite to defer the hearing and the petition has been heard in the absence of any representation on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 11.03.2015 (hereafter “the impugned order”) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “the CIC”). The petitioner claims that a plot bearing Municipal no.5, Feroz Gandhi Marg, Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi was allotted to the petitioner’s grandmother, Smt. Raj Kumari Seth. There is some dispute as to the said allotment because the said plot was also allotted to another person. In the af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.