SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2792

VIBHU BAKHRU
Anjali Seth – Appellant
Versus
Central Information Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Deepak Agarwal

ORDER :

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. None for the respondents. Notice in this petition was issued on 29.05.2015 and four weeks” time was granted to the respondents to file the counter affidavit. On 06.05.2016, a final opportunity was granted to the respondents to file the counter affidavit within a period of one week from that date and it was clarified that failing the same, their right to file the counter affidavit would stand closed. However despite sufficient time, no such counter affidavit was filed to oppose the present petition. In the circumstances, this Court did not consider it apposite to defer the hearing and the petition has been heard in the absence of any representation on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 11.03.2015 (hereafter “the impugned order”) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “the CIC”). The petitioner claims that a plot bearing Municipal no.5, Feroz Gandhi Marg, Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi was allotted to the petitioner’s grandmother, Smt. Raj Kumari Seth. There is some dispute as to the said allotment because the said plot was also allotted to another person. In the af














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top