SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 2128

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kartar Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the first appellate court dated 7.2.2017 by which the first appellate court has set aside the judgment of the trial court dated 15.3.2016. The trial court by its judgment dated 15.3.2016 had dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 2 lacs filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellant/ defendant as being time-barred. The first appellate court has held that the suit is within limitation and therefore the suit was decreed. I may note that the appellant/defendant though was served in the suit but he did not file his written statement nor did he lead any evidence.

2. The facts of the case are that the subject suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking recovery of Rs. 2 lacs and which the respondent/plaintiff pleaded was taken by the appellant/defendant for engagement and marriage of his two daughters. A sum of Rs. 1,40,000/- was given by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top