SANJIV KHANNA, PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rahul Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
1. The petitioner-Rahul Chauhan had applied for selection as Constable (General Duty) in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) for the year 2015-16 under the sports quota.
2. Vide opinion of the Medical Board dated 25th October, 2016, the petitioner was declared medically unfit for not meeting the prescribed visual standard. Copy of the memorandum of the Medical Board is not on record. However, it is accepted that the petitioner was declared unfit for the reason that he had poor distant vision (6/24 right eye).
3. The petitioner applied for review vide application dated 8th November, 2016 and was examined by the Review Medical Board on 12th January, 2017. The review medical examination proforma has been placed on record at page 34. The petitioner has made certain allegations against the doctors who had examined him, but in the absence of cogent and reliable evidence, we would refrain from expressing any opinion.
4. The review medical examination proforma records that the petitioner was not willing for investigation. There is another noting in the handwriting and w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.