SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 1704

SANJIV KHANNA, PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rahul Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vishwendra Verma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Kushal Kumar with Ms. Monika Arora.

JUDGMENT :

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

1. The petitioner-Rahul Chauhan had applied for selection as Constable (General Duty) in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) for the year 2015-16 under the sports quota.

2. Vide opinion of the Medical Board dated 25th October, 2016, the petitioner was declared medically unfit for not meeting the prescribed visual standard. Copy of the memorandum of the Medical Board is not on record. However, it is accepted that the petitioner was declared unfit for the reason that he had poor distant vision (6/24 right eye).

3. The petitioner applied for review vide application dated 8th November, 2016 and was examined by the Review Medical Board on 12th January, 2017. The review medical examination proforma has been placed on record at page 34. The petitioner has made certain allegations against the doctors who had examined him, but in the absence of cogent and reliable evidence, we would refrain from expressing any opinion.

4. The review medical examination proforma records that the petitioner was not willing for investigation. There is another noting in the handwriting and w















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top