RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Vijay Kumar Taneja – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Taneja – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
The plaintiff instituted this suit for partition of property No. C-1/6, West Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi and for ancillary reliefs pleading:
(i) That the plaintiff and six defendants are the daughters and sons of Late Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja.
(ii) That Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja died intestate on 27th February, 1997 leaving the plaintiff and the six defendants as his only legal heirs.
(iii) That during his lifetime, Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja acquired property No. C-1/6, West Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi-110034 and on demise of Sh. Jugal Kishore Taneja, the plaintiff being one of his seven legal heirs became 1/7th owner of the property.
(iv) That the plaintiff is in occupation of and residing on the second floor of the property.
(v) That partition though claimed has been denied.
2. The suit was entertained and vide ex parte order dated 20th June, 2008, status quo was required to be maintained with respect to the property.
3. The defendants no.1&2 filed a joint written statement (amended) pleading:
(i) That the plaintiff has not included all the assets left by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.