SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3380

MUKTA GUPTA
Tata Sons Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Lokesh Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :Mr. Karan Kamra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. In the present suit plaintiffs pray for the following reliefs:

(i). An order for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, as the case may be, their officers, servants and agents from selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in services of any description baring the trademarks of the Plaintiffs collectively known as TATA house marks and/or any mark/s /logo/trade name deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s registered trademarks, amounting to infringing of the registered trade marks of the Plaintiffs including but not limited to registration No. 838432 in class 16, No. 1247045 in Class 35, No. 1247046 in Class 36, No. 1632278 in Class 37, No. 1247048 in Class 38, No. 1247049 in Class 39, No. 1247050 in Class 40, No. 1247051 in Class 41 and No. 1247052 in Class 42;

(ii). An order for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners or proprietors, as the case may be, their officers, servants and agents from selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top