VINOD GOEL
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
VINOG GOEL, J.
1. Apprehending his arrest in a case registered vide FIR No. 0267/2015 dated 14.04.2015 under Section 379 IPC, PS RMD Main (ODRS), District Crime & Railways, Delhi, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC’)
2. Status report has been filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the name of the petitioner has figured only in the disclosure statement of the co-accused.
4. Per contra, learned APP vehemently opposes the bail application. He submits that huge amounts of jewellery belonging to an innocent passenger was stolen at the Old Delhi Railway Station, who was coming from Dehradun by the Mussoorie Express. While the said train crossed the Shahdara Railway Station, one person offered her help in taking out her luggage near the gate of the coach as Old Delhi Railway Station was approaching near. The victim declined the offer but later she agreed to shift her luggage/suit case in the corridor and in the meantime 7-8 persons assembled near the suit case an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.