SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3600

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Suraj Munni – Appellant
Versus
Sachin Bhatia – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

1. This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act’) is filed by the claimants impugning the judgment of the Employee’s Compensation Commissioner dated 18.12.2015 whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants under Section 22 of the Act was dismissed and wherein compensation was prayed on account of the death of the son of the claimants one Sh. Vipin Kumar.

2. The facts of the case are that the deceased was pleaded to have been employed as a driver at wages Rs.7,000/-per month with the respondent no.1 on the vehicle of the respondent no.1 TSR registration no.DL-01RK-6298. The deceased met with an accident on 6.8.2009 at 2.00 P.M. at Azadpur Fly Over, Delhi when the deceased was working in the course of employment with the respondent no.1. Sh. Vipin Kumar died due to injuries caused by the accident arising out of and in the course of employment. DD No.7A was lodged at Adarsh Nagar, New Delhi and post mortem was conducted in Babu Jagjiwan Ram Hospital, Delhi. Respondent no.1 was proceeded ex-parteand it was only respondent no.2/insurance company which contested the claim petition and fi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top