SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3620

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Bijender Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Anil Sabharwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Suman Chauhan and Mr. Jivesh Tiwari.
For the Respondent: Mr. Dilip Pandita.

JUDGMENT :

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.

1. The petitioner has laid challenge to the judgment and order dated 06.10.2016/07.10.2016 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, South-01, N.I.Act, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.117/2014 whereby he has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and has been sentenced to undergo SI for a period of eight months, to pay a fine of Rs.50 lakhs payable as compensation to the respondent/complainant and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for four months and the judgment in appeal (Crl.Appeal No.54/2016) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, CBI-03, P.C Act, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the judgment and order of conviction and sentence by the Trial Court has been affirmed and upheld.

2. The petitioner is alleged to have issued five cheques drawn on HDFC Bank, Chattarpur, New Delhi in favour of the respondent as security to a loan agreement which is said to have been executed on 17.01.2012 for having received Rs.50 lakhs from the respondent. The aforesaid cheques, on presentation by the respondent in the bank, were dishonoured because of the “instruc















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top