SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3831

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Nutan Chadha – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Chander Saini – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Appl. Nos. 34210/2017 & 34212/2017 (for exemptions)

Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The applications stand disposed of.

C.M. Appl. Nos. 34208/2017 & 34211/2017

These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 80 days in filing the appeal and 46 days in re-filing the appeal.

For the reasons stated in the applications the same are allowed and the delays of filing and re-filing the appeal are condoned.

C.Ms. stand disposed of.

RFA No. 797/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 34209/2017 (for stay)

1. This regular first appeal under Section 96 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the trial court dated 22.12.2016, as amended by the order dated 20.3.2017 with respect to the correct description of the property, whereby the suit for partition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs has been decreed with respect to the suit property 258, Ram Nagar, Krishna Nagar, Delhi–110051.

2. The admitted facts are that the suit property belonged to the father Sh. Nand Lal Saini in terms of a registered sale deed dated 30.7.1960. It is furth

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top