SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3832

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Vidhi AgenciesThrough Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Gagneja – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. G.S. Gangwar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Appl. No. 34258/2017 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

FAO No. 375/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 34259/2017 (for stay)

1. This is a first appeal filed under Order XLIII(1)(d) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the order of the trial court dated 25.8.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and refused to set aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 21.1.2015.

2. By the ex-parte judgment dated 21.1.2015 the suit was decreed against the appellant/defendant for a sum of Rs.4,57,902/- along with interest on account of goods having been supplied by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant and with respect to which a cheque was issued for a sum of Rs.5,52,172/- dated 17.8.2009 drawn on Indian Overseas Bank but that cheque was dishonoured. Trial court after considering the evidence passed the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 21.1.2015 and the relevant paras of that judgment being paras 4 to 6 read as under:-

“4. To prove its case, the plaintiff company has examined Shri Amal Ghosal, Attorney,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top