MUKTA GUPTA
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
HARISH KUMAR – Respondent
I.A. No. 9673/2017 (under Order XVI Rule 1A read with Section 151 CPC-by defendants)
1. By this application defendants pray that a handwriting expert be permitted to take photographs of the signature of the plaintiff on the documents exhibited as Ex. DW-1/1, DW-3/3 and DW-3/5 from the Court record and compare the same with the admitted signatures of the plaintiff from the court record in the presence of the parties before the Deputy Registrar/Joint Registrar and also for directions to the plaintiff to give his specimen signature/handwriting for comparison, directions to DW-3 Shri Satish Malik, Clerk, Office of District Town Planner, Sonepat, Haryana to produce the original records pertaining to Exhibit DW-3/3 and DW-3/5 and directions to the handwriting expert to submit his report before the Court.
2. Plaintiff Rajesh Kumar has filed the present suit against the defendants, that is, Harish Kumar and Rakesh Kumar seeking permanent injunction, dissolution of the partnership firm M/s. HIFLY INDUSTRIES and rendition of account.
3. In the plaint the claim of Rajesh Kumar is that M/s. HIFLY INDUSTRIES was a partnership firm created vide Partnership Deed dated 18th October, 1993 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.