SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 3918

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
PARKER H. CROFT JR - Petitioner
Versus
STATE & ORS. - Respondents
TEST.CAS. 58 OF 2009
Decided On : 21-09-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.S. Chaggar, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the proof of the Will dated 12th December, 2005 by the petitioner, leading to the grant of letter of administration in favor of the petitioner.

Headnote:

Indian Succession Act - Grant of Probate/Letter of Administration - Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - [IMMOVABLE PROPERTY: R-17, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi- 110016; HIG9, Jakhoo Hill Housing Board Colony, Simla- 171002, HP, India; Agricultural land in Village Khaddor Sahib Tehsil Tarn Taran, District Amritsar, Punjab, India; MOVABLE PROPERTIES: Jewellry and ornaments in Locker No.173, Punjab National Bank, Lodhi Colony, New Delhi; Deposits in Syndicate Bank and The Kotak Mahindra bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi; FDRs with The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi] - The court granted letter of administration in favor of the petitioner for the property left behind by the deceased as mentioned above, subject to the requisite court fees/stamp duty being furnished in accordance with the valuation report to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought grant of probate/Letter of Administration in respect of the last Will of Late Shri Daljeet Singh Bawa executed on 12th December, 2005 in favor of the petitioner. The deceased passed away leaving behind immovable and movable properties, and the petitioner was the adopted son and sole legatee and beneficiary in respect of the estate of the deceased.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner proved the Will dated 12th December, 2005 duly executed by the deceased and granted letter of administration in favor of the petitioner for the property left behind by the deceased.

Issues: The issues settled by the court were whether the deceased died leaving behind his last valid Will dated 12.12.2005 and the relief sought.

Ratio Decidendi: The court was satisfied with the testimony of witnesses and documents presented, concluding that the petitioner proved the Will dated 12th December, 2005, and therefore granted letter of administration in favor of the petitioner.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and the court granted letter of administration in favor of the petitioner for the property left behind by the deceased, subject to the requisite court fees/stamp duty being furnished in accordance with the valuation report to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of the Court.

JUDGMENT :

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. By the present petition filed under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the petitioner seeks grant of probate/Letter of Administration in respect of the last Will of Late Shri Daljeet Singh Bawa executed on 12th December, 2005 in favour of the petitioner.

2. Briefly stated, the petitioner is the adopted son of the deceased Late Shri Daljeet Singh Bawa and is residing at 2895-H, Kamookoa Road, Kilauea, Hawaii, 96754, USA. The petitioner has appointed Shri Mukhtyar Singh as his Special Attorney vide Special Power of Attorney dated 30th March, 2009 to sign, verify and file the present petition.

3. The deceased, Late Shri Daljeet Singh Bawa, passed away on 27th March, 2008 at Delhi after executing a Will dated 12th December, 2005 bequeathing and vesting all his movable and immovable properties unto a Trust named “Bawa Development Study” and appointed the petitioner as the permanent Chairman and the sole trustee of the Trust. Shri Mukhtyar Singh was appointed as the Vice-Chairman of the Trust. The Will dated 12th December, 2005 was duly registered with Sub-Registrar-V, Delhi.

4. The details of all the movable and immovable properties bequeathed upon the trust is enumerated as under:

“IMMOVABLE PROPERTY

i. R-17, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi- 110016 fully built-up.

ii. HIG9, Jakhoo Hill Housing Board Colony, Simla- 171002, HP, India.

iii. Agricultural land of approximately one killa and a residential plot of approximately 1000 square meters in Village Khaddor Sahib Tehsil Tarn Taran, District Amritsar, Punjab, India

MOVABLE PROPERTIES

i. The jewellry and ornaments of late wife of the deceased Sh. D.S. Bawa in Locker No.173, Punjab National Bank, Lodhi Colony, New Delhi

ii. Deposits lying in the following bank accounts:-

(a) A/c No. 90492010015685 Syndicate Bank, Hauz Khas, New Delhi in the name of “Bawa Development Study” having credit balance of Rs.3,27,974.00

(b) A/c No. 90492010000679 Syndicate Bank, Hauz Khas, New Delhi in the name of Shri D.S. Bawa having credit balance of Rs.14,86,906.00

(c) A/c No. 01750020000246 with The Kotak Mahindra bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi in the name of “Bawa Development Study” having credit balance of Rs.2,48,455.00

(d) A/c No. 01750020000081 with The Kotak Mahindra bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi in the name of Shri D.S. Bawa having credit balance of Rs.5,02,095.00

(e) FDR No. 01753630000072 in the sum of Rs.25,000.00 with The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi.

(f) FDR No. 01753730000475 in the sum of Rs.3,00,000.00 with The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi.

(g) FDR No. 01753730001035 in the sum of Rs.15,00,000.00 with The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Safdurjang Enclave, New Delhi.”

5. At the time of the death of the deceased, he had no other legal heir except the petitioner, since the wife of the deceased namely Smt. Mohinder Kaur had predeceased him and the two children born out of the wedlock died at a very early state i.e. the daughter soon after the birth and the son at the age of 15 years. Thus, the deceased is not survived by any other class I legal heir except the petitioner. As per the Will, the petitioner is the sole legatee and beneficiary in respect of the estate of the deceased and has also been named as the executor of the Will.

6. The petitioner had filed a schedule of relatives which was taken on record vide order dated 4th March, 2011. As per the schedule, Smt. Mahinder Kaur, sister of the deceased, was the only relative of the deceased. During the pendency of the present petition, Smt. Mahinder Kaur passed away on 8th June, 2011 and her legal heirs were brought on record namely Mrs. Barinder Rekhi (respondent no. 2) [though wrongly named as Surinder Rekhi in amended memo of parties, also noted vide order dated 30.4.2014], Mr. Harbhajan Uppal (respondent no.3), Ms. Dhiraj Bhalla (respondent no. 4) and Mr. Prithpal Singh Bhalla (respondent no. 5). Since no objections were filed by the aforesaid legal hei













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top