S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. We have heard counsel for the parties.

2. The dispute in this case pertains to the disconnection of electricity to three premises i.e. 470-472 Chandni Chowk; one appeal has been preferred by Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta (hereafter referred to as “the tenant”) and the other by Ms. Nisha Sharma (hereafter referred to as “the landlady”).

3. The impugned order outlines that sometime in the year 2005 a Division Bench had recorded an undertaking by the tenant that within three months he would incorporate fire safety measures in accordance with law. Complaining that the undertaking was violated, the landlady approached this Court in contempt proceedings. The impugned order was made in the course of contempt proceedings, on 01.05.2017. In the meanwhile, on 24.03.2017, a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.387/2016 (filed by the landlady) clarified that the water tank would be constructed under supervision of one Dr. Maqsud E. Nazar in view of the consensual order made in a previous contempt proceeding i.e. CC No.690/2010.

4. The impugned order recorded inter alia as follows:

“7. Today, learned counsel for Delhi Fire Service has handed over a status report dated 24th