SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4003

HIMA KOHLI, DEEPA SHARMA
Neelam Kadyan – Appellant
Versus
Naveen Dalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate

ORDER :

1. The appellant/wife is aggrieved by the order dated 09.3.2017, passed by the learned Family Court disposing of her application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short ‘the Act’), praying inter alia for grant of maintenance @ of Rs.60,000/- per month, for herself and the two minor children.

2. Under the impugned order, the learned Family Court refused to grant maintenance to the appellant in view of the fact that she is working as an Assistant Professor (Law) at the Rohtak University and her gross monthly income is to the tune of Rs.80,000/-. However, two minor children of the parties, a daughter aged about 16 years and a son aged about 10 years, have been granted pendente lite maintenance @ Rs.28,000/- per month, payable from the date of filing of the application, i.e., w.e.f. 03.10.2013. The respondent/husband has been directed to clear the arrears of maintenance in six equal monthly instalments, the first instalment payable by 15.4.2017. He has further been directed to pay the remaining five instalments of maintenance on or before 15th day of each calendar month, commencing from June, 2017. The respondent has also directed to pay litigation expens








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top