VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Firoz Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Rustam – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
C.M. Appl. No. 39034/2017 (for delay)
1. Though there is no reason to grant condonation of delay of 220 days in filing the appeal, since however I have heard counsel for the appellant on merits, this application is therefore allowed for that reason only.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 255/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 39035/2017 (for stay)
2. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the appellant/plaintiff no. 2 impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 5.6.2012 and the first appellate court dated 5.11.2016; by which the suit filed for cancellation of the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 and the consequent mutation letter dated 16.12.1999 have been dismissed by the courts below.
3. Though a reading the plaint did not make it very clear that the appellant/plaintiff no.2 impugns the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 whether because the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 is of 52 sq. yards whereas it should be only for 35½ sq. yards under the agreement to sell dated 22.1.1999 pursuant to which the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 was executed or whether the sale deed dated 12.11.1999
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.