SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4040

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Firoz Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Rustam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.R. Jangu, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Appl. No. 39034/2017 (for delay)

1. Though there is no reason to grant condonation of delay of 220 days in filing the appeal, since however I have heard counsel for the appellant on merits, this application is therefore allowed for that reason only.

The application stands disposed of.

RSA No. 255/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 39035/2017 (for stay)

2. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the appellant/plaintiff no. 2 impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 5.6.2012 and the first appellate court dated 5.11.2016; by which the suit filed for cancellation of the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 and the consequent mutation letter dated 16.12.1999 have been dismissed by the courts below.

3. Though a reading the plaint did not make it very clear that the appellant/plaintiff no.2 impugns the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 whether because the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 is of 52 sq. yards whereas it should be only for 35½ sq. yards under the agreement to sell dated 22.1.1999 pursuant to which the sale deed dated 12.11.1999 was executed or whether the sale deed dated 12.11.1999





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top