SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4050

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Phoenix Arc Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nitin Mittal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. No.40462/2017 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. No.40463/2017 (for condonation of delay)

2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 65 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.942/2017

3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 23.3.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.9,33,833.84/- along with interest at 9% per annum. Respondent/defendant/asset reconstruction company was the assignee of the creditor and the appellant/defendant was the borrower who had failed to repay the loan amount.

4. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff pleaded that the appellant/defendant approached the erstwhile the Royal Bank of Scotland which was successor of ABN Amro Bank for grant of a personal loan and the appellant/defendant was granted personal loan on 18.7.2008 of an amount of Rs.7,98,589/- repayable in 60 monthly installments of Rs.20,492/-. It was pleaded that the appella





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top