SANJIV KHANNA, NAVIN CHAWLA
Murari Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shweta Tiwari – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
This intra Court appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 and Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code, for short) impugns the order dated 19th July, 2016 passed by the single Judge dismissing the Chamber Appeal against the orders closing the right of the appellant Murari Sharma, defendant No. 13 in CS(OS) No. 109/2014, Shweta Tiwari versus The Editor-in-Chief, Amar Ujala and Company to file his written statement.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and with their consent have taken up the appeal for hearing and disposal.
3. Shweta Tiwari, the first respondent before us, has filed the aforesaid suit for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts and damages of Rs.1 crore. The allegation is that the appellant herein had used the respondent’s photograph in the advertisements of their products “kesh pari” hair oil without her consent, approval and knowledge. It is alleged by the respondent that she is a well-recognised and a well-known personality and the illegal use of her photograph by the appellant has caused irreparable damage to her celebrity status and also caused emotional distres
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.