SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4421

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
MANJU DEVI – Appellant
Versus
PREMJIT KAUR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Shiv Kumar Kohli, Advocate with Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

C.M. Appl. No. 44438/2017 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. Appl. No. 44435/2017 and 44437/2017 (for delays)

These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 781 days in filing the appeal and 28 days in filing the appeal.

Though there is no reason to condone the huge delay because the only ground for seeking condonation that the counsel did not file the appeal is not believable, yet, since the appellant has been heard on merits of the appeal, hence only delay is condoned.

C.Ms. stand disposed of.

RFA No.1026/2017 and C.M. Appl. No. 44436/2017 (for stay)

1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 7.7.2015 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/-along with interest at 9% per annum.

2. The facts of the case pleaded by the respondent/plaintiff were that the appellant/defendant approached the respondent/plaintiff that the owner of a property bearing no. C-7/492 admeasuring 25 sq. yards, J.J. Co



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top