SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
SHUBHAM CHAWLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code,1973 (hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’) the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR No. 264/2017, under Section 354/323/341/506/427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as ‘IPC’), registered by P.S. Amar Colony, New-Delhi.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the complaint was lodged by Ketika/complainant alleging that on 07.07.2017 at around 09.30 am, when she was leaving for her coaching centre in an auto rickshaw, the petitioner came near the auto rickshaw, stopped her vehicle, pulled her out and asked her to come along with him. On her refusal to do so, the petitioner threatened her and even snatched her phone. Thereby the complaint was lodged by the complainant under Section 354/323/341/506/427 of IPC. Hence, the present petition.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the present FIR filed against the petitioner is false and fabricated; that the petitioner and the complainant were in relationship with each other since two and a half years, which was not accepted by her parents and therefore, implicated him in a f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.