RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SPICEJET LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR – Respondent
CMs No. 40407/2017 & 40408/2017 (both for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
CM(M) 1269/2017 & CM No.40406/2017 (for stay)
3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 15th July, 2017 in CS No. 15562/2016 (Old No. 230/2016) of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-04 (South West), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi] granting unconditional leave to the respondent/defendant to defend the suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.10 lakhs, on the basis of cheques issued by the respondent/defendant in favour of the petitioner/plaintiff and an agreement entered into between the respondent/defendant and the petitioner/ plaintiff, who had an employer and employee relationship.
4. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff is not that the leave to defend application should have been dismissed but that conditional leave to defend should have been granted. However, the counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff at this stage states that his first contention is that the leave to defend application should have b
IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited Vs. Hubtown Limited
Mechelec Engineers & Manufacturers Vs. Basic Equipment Corporation
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Saw Pipes Ltd.
State Bank of Saurashtra Vs. Ashit Shipping Services (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.