VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

Review Petition No.321/2017 in FAO No.303/2017

Review Petition No.317/2017 in FAO No.305/2017

1. These review petitions have been preferred by the respondent no.1 in the appeals. Respondent no.1 in the appeals is the plaintiff in the two suits filed in the trial court. Review petitions are filed seeking review of the judgment passed by this Court deciding two appeals being FAO Nos. 303/2017 and 305/2017. The two appeals were preferred by the appellant/Oriental Bank of Commerce, a defendant in the suit. In the suit, in which impugned order is passed which is subject matter of the FAO No. 303/2017, the appellant/bank is arrayed as defendant no.3. In the impugned order which is passed in the suit which is subject matter of FAO No. 305/2017, the appellant/bank is arrayed as defendant no.5. By the impugned orders dated 15.5.2017, the applications filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff in the suit under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) were allowed and the defendants in the suit including the appellant/bank were restrained from dispossessing the respondent no.1/plaintiff from the suit properties during the pendency of the suit