SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 20

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Dayanand Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal Khattar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh

JUDGMENT :

Valmiki J. Mehta, J.

1. These two Regular First Appeals are under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed against the two judgments of the trial court dated 19.8.2017. The impugned judgments dated 19.8.2017 were passed in two connected suits. RFA No. 1065/2017 pertains to a suit for possession, damages etc filed by the respondent/Sh. Ram Lal Khattar against the appellant no.1/defendant no.1 with respect to two rooms in the property bearing no.F-82, East of Kailash, New Delhi. RFA No. 1064/2017 pertains to a suit filed by the appellant no.1/Sh. Dayanand Rajan seeking partition of the property bearing no.F-82, East of Kailash, New Delhi. Parties to both the suits are the children and legal heirs of late Sh. Khan Chand. Suit for possession which has been decreed by the impugned judgment dated 19.8.2017 is the suit filed by the respondent/Sh. Ram Lal Khattar and in which suit there were three defendants namely Sh. Dayanand Rajan, Smt. Sohan Devi (since deceased) and Sh. Shyam Lal. The plaintiff in this suit Sh. Ram Lal Khattar, the defendant no.1 and the defendant no.3 were real brothers. Smt. Sohan Devi being the wife of late Sh. Khan Chand is the mother





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top