SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4676

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
NARESH KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
LALLAN SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Advocate with Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Nos. 43487/2017 (exemption) & 43489/2017 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M.s stand disposed of.

C.M. No.43491/2017 (for condonation of delay)

2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 262 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.1002/2017 and C.M. Nos.43488/2017 (stay) & 43490/2017 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC)

3. This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the Trial Court dated 5.12.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC in the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.6,28,889,34/-along with interest

4. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit for recovery of Rs.6,28,889,34/-along with interest pleading that respondent/plaintiff was in the business of metal scrap, waste paper etc under the name and style of Krishna Trading Co. It was pleaded that on 15.1.2011, the appellant/defendant purchased 3,920 kg of aluminium scrap from the respondent/plaintiff at a pric





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top