VIPIN SANGHI, J.

Review Pet. No.333/2017

1. The affidavit has been filed by the respondents in terms of our order dated 01.09.2017. The respondent No.2 states in the said affidavit that the vacancy position in respect of TGT (Hindi) in the Directorate of Education, GNCTD is 422, which includes 271 (Male) and 151 (Female). Thus, it is evident that a vacancy is available, which could be filled by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner had preferred the writ petition to assail the order dated 27.03.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal) in C.P. No.548/2016 arising out of O.A. No.203/2015. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, had dismissed the said contempt petition preferred by the petitioner. When the writ petition was heard, the same was dismissed by our judgment dated 24.04.2017 – of which the petitioner now seeks review.

3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that while passing the order dated 24.04.2017 dismissing the writ petition, this Court had not taken into consideration the order passed by the Tribunal on 20.02.2017 in the said contempt petition. Mr. Tandon points out that the speaking order dated