SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 4800

YOGESH KHANNA
Subodh Vir Raheja – Appellant
Versus
BDCS Media Vision Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Saurabh Seth and Ms. Sumeera Seth.

JUDGMENT :

YOGESH KHANNA, J.

1. The respondent is not present today. It has been served and an affidavit of service is filed by the petitioner herein stating the summons were sent at the registered office of the respondent Lift No. 7(G) Ashoka Estate, 24, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110001 as well as at the tenanted premises A-12, Sector 93-B, First Floor, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. On 16.12.2017 at the registered office. It is submitted the summons were served on the respondent by way of Registered AD Post and Speed Post. The copy of the tracking status showing Door locked-intimation served. In addition, the respondent also served through emails on its email id pratinidhi@pratinidhi.tv and hr@pratinidhi.tv. The email dated 14.12.2017 was sent to the respondent alongwith the copy of summons and the petition. None has appeared on behalf of the respondent, hence I proceed to decide.

2. This petition is under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 seeking urgent interim relief. The facts of the case are as under:

(a) On 01.05.2017 the petitioners and the respondent through Mr. Alok Kumar, who was duly authorized vide Board Resolution dated 25.04.2017 signed a Lease Agreement dat












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top