SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 43

MUKTA GUPTA
Rahul Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Tarun Chandiok
For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Ms. Kamna Vohra

JUDGMENT :

Mukta Gupta, J.

1. Petitioner by the present petition seeks quashing of FIR No.310/2015 under Sections 195A, 506, 34 IPC registered at PS Najafgarh, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 herein.

2. Contents of FIR No. 310/2015 are as under:

“It is stated that I reside at the above-noted address along with my family. On 02.02.2015, FIR No. 88/2015 was registered upon my complaint against Rahul S/o Shri Bhagatram who had threatened me either to withdraw my complaint or else he would kill me and my family. That on 16.04.2015, at around 9:45 PM, when I was at my residence along with my family, someone knocked at the door. When my father opened the door, two persons asked him to come out to have a word with him. My father went out with them and after walking a little distance, two more persons joined them and one of them asked my father to advice his daughter that whatever case she has filed against Rahul be withdrawn else you and your family members will have to bear dire consequences and pushed me aside while leaving. In the meanwhile, my other family members reached there and called up 100 no. In order to have the case withdrawn against him, Rahul has threatened me and my



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top