SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 68

MANMOHAN
Maya Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Unique Law Publication House – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Pavit Singh Katoch, Mr. Rajat Jain

JUDGMENT :

Manmohan, J.

1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining passing off, dilution, unfair trade competition and rendition of accounts. The prayers made in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:-

"(a) A decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their promoters, partners, family members, dealers, distributors, retailers, representatives, franchisees, agents, servants, successor in title or anyone acting for and on their behalf from passing off the books published and sold by them by using the trademark "Unique" or "Unique 20" or trade dress of the Plaintiff or any trademark comprising the word "Unique" or as a part of their trade name/business identity including "Unique Law Publication House" or in any other similar or deceptively similar manner with respect to any of their businesses, products or services, and further from diluting the goodwill of the Plaintiff or indulging in any unfair Trade practices;

(b) Pass an order directing the defendants to deliver and hand over all infringing material including Books, boxes, labels, packing material, publicity material, stationery, bill books, blocks and plates or any other printed material etc.





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top