IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence - Petitioner
Versus
Samson Ongera Omoro - Respondent
Crl. L.P. 374 of 2016
Decided On : 20-04-2018
NDPS Act - Acquittal - Section 21(c) - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act, which deals with punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations. The court also considered the procedures under Section 50 of the NDPS Act regarding the search of a person. The interpretation of the voluntary nature of the statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act and the credibility of the statement were key legal provisions influencing the court's decision.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the respondent was found in possession of a large quantity of heroin. The respondent claimed to have been falsely implicated and presented evidence to support his alibi. The prosecution's case was weakened by discrepancies in the evidence, including the credibility of witnesses and the voluntary nature of the respondent's statement.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the evidence presented did not conclusively prove the guilt of the respondent, and the acquittal by the trial court was not illegal or perverse.
Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of witnesses, the voluntary nature of the respondent's statement, and the sufficiency of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of credible evidence and the voluntary nature of statements under the NDPS Act. The discrepancies in the prosecution's case and the lack of conclusive evidence led to the acquittal.
Final Decision: The petition for leave to appeal was declined, and the petition was dismissed. The trial court's acquittal of the respondent was upheld.
Mukta Gupta, J.
1. By this petition the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 4th June, 2016 acquitting the respondent for offence punishable under Section 21 (c) of NDPS Act.
2. Case of the prosecution is that an information was received by Shri Surjeet Kumar, Senior Intelligence Officer, DRI (PW-6) on 29th July, 2010 that a person of African origin, aged about 40 years would be standing at the bus stand, Nirankari Sarover, Burari crossing and would be in possession of narcotic drug. The information was reduced in writing vide Ex.PW-2A and placed before Shri Atul Handa, Deputy Director who instructed Shri R. Roy, Intelligence Officer (PW-2) to take necessary action. A team was constituted and a seal was obtained. Two panch witnesses namely Raju and Rakesh were also joined from near ITO at around 8.00 PM. After they reached the crossing at Burari red light at around 10.00 PM the officials noticed a person who matched the description given in the information carrying a black shoulder bag and waiting at the spot. After about 10-15 minutes when nobody approached him, he got suspicious of a surveillance and started walking towards Nirankari Colony. Thus the officials gave a signal to stop but he started running. After a brief scuffle resulting in injury on or around the respondent’s right eye, he was apprehended and he disclosed his identity as Samson Ongera Omoro. Respondent was informed of his right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. Section 50 NDPS Notice was given and he was taken to DRI office along with the bag where search was conducted. In the personal search of the respondent, a driving license was recovered and from the bag ten polythene packets were recovered. On detailed examination of the three packets each packet was found to contain a heat sealed transparent polythene packet containing white colour bag with a rubber stamp. The sealed plastic packets contained off white granule powdery substance emanating a pungent smell. The stamped packets were marked A-1 to A-10 for the purpose of identification. Small quantities of samples were taken from each of the ten packets and on testing gave positive of heroin. Total weight of the heroin was found to be 10.43 kgs and the net weight was found to be 10.204 kgs. Samples of 5 gms each were drawn and paper seals were affixed. Panchnama was also prepared and the facsimile of the seal was affixed on the test memos. Panchnama was duly signed by panch witnesses and PW-8.
3. Statement of respondent was recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act who disclosed that one of his friends was lodged in Patiala Jail, whom he met sometime back in Jail and thereafter he met a person Amrit Singh who proposed him to carry the narcotics to Delhi, where somebody will collect the same and he would be paid Rs.25,000/- plus traveling expenses. The narcotic drug was handed over by Amrit Singh at Patiala on 29th July, 2010 at about 9.00 AM which was recovered. Search of the tenanted residential premises was taken however, nothing incriminating was found except Rs.33,600/- and US$ 964 which was handed over to the friend of the respondent. Statements of the panch witnesses were also recorded.
4. On a complaint being filed, witnesses were examined. Respondent in his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. claimed that he had been falsely implicated. He stated that he was standing outside his house with his Honda Activa on 29th July, 2010, when some persons in plain clothes came to him and forcibly took him to the office where he was threatened, pressurized and beaten and his family history was obtained. No public person was present at the office of DRI. When he was taken to the hospital he was threatened not to disclose anything to the doctor and despite advice of admission by the doctor, DRI officials managed his discharge. He also led defence evidence examining Assistant Manager, State Bank of India, Vijay Nagar to show that he visited his bank and deposited a su
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.