SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 182

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
PARI SERVICE P. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PENNZOIL QUAKER STATE INDIA LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Shilpi Chowdhary, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

CM APPL. 36658/2017 (restoration) in RFA 51/2007

1. This is an application seeking restoration of the appeal which was dismissed on 12th September, 2017. For ready reference the order dated 12th September, 2017 is extracted herein below :

“Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant.

Perusal of record shows that the present appeal was filed in the year 2007. The appeal was admitted on 08.07.2009. On 18.07.2011, nobody appeared for the appellant and the matter remained on board. On 19.07.2011 and 25.07.2011 again nobody appeared for the appellant. The appeal and applications were dismissed on 25.07.2011. Thereafter on 23.08.2011, the appeal was restored to its original number and ordered to be listed as per its own turn in the Regular List. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 25.08.2017 nobody appeared for the appellant. Today also nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant.

The conduct of the appellant shows that they are not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Consequently the present appeal is dismissed in default.”

2. A perusal of the order





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top