PRATHIBA M.SINGH
NEETA SARDA – Appellant
Versus
ADITYA SARDA – Respondent
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
RFA 461/2016
1. The Court spent considerable time in hearing this matter on the last date and today. On the last date, a Local Commissioner was also appointed to report on the exact status of the property. Parties almost agreed on the terms and conditions during the course of these hearings. However, while the Court was dictating the order recording the terms of settlement, parties did not wish to give consent to the terms. In view of the same, there appears to be no possibility of settlement between the parties.
2. Admit. List in due course.
CM Nos.25296/2016, 39189/2017 & 45405/2017
3. By CM Nos.39189/2017 & 45405/2017, Appellants have prayed for stay of the execution proceedings in Execution Petition No.751/2017 pending before learned ADJ-05 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, till final disposal of the appeal. By CM No.25296/2016, the Appellants are seeking stay of judgment and decree dated 25th May, 2016, till final disposal of the present appeal.
4. Present appeal has been preferred challenging the impugned order dated 25th May, 2016 by which the Trial Court was pleased to direct division of the suit property as per the report dated 23rd April, 2016 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.