R.K.GAUBA
RAMESH WATI – Appellant
Versus
HAR NARAIN – Respondent
1. This revision petition was preferred to bring a challenge to the judgment dated 12.07.2015 of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) whereby the eviction petition (E-82/2003) instituted on 04.03.2003 by the petitioners seeking an order of eviction on the ground of bonafide need in terms of Section 14 (1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of the premises described as one room measuring 15.6 x 13’ alongwith veranda store measuring 6’ x 7’, open courtyard measuring 7.8 x 9.8, bathroom measuring 6’ x 3’ and a common latrine, as shown in colour red in site plan (Ex. PW1/1) forming part of house no.4537-38, Arya Pura, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110 007 (hereinafter referred to as “the tenanted premises”) was dismissed.
2. The eviction case, as originally brought before the ARC by Smt. Ramesh Wati and Leelawati both concededly co-landlords vis-a-vis the respondent in respect of the tenanted premises, they being residents of house no.4550, Arya Pura, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110 007, a property distinct from the property of which the tenanted premises forms a part. Smt. Leelawati, second petitioner died during the pendency of the case before the Rent Controller and stood substituted b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.