DEEPA SHARMA, J.

1. In the present Letter Patents Appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 07.05.2015 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3061/2014, wherein her petition seeking quashing of transfer and relieving orders dated 28.04.2014 and 02.05.2014 respectively, was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as a clerk vide her appointment letter dated 11.02.1997. In the appointment letter, there was a transfer clause. The appointment letter is reproduced herein:-

“Guri Harkrishan Public School

Fateh Nagar, New Delhi-110018

13-52/96-97/Est.

11thFebruary, 1997

MEMORANDUM

The performance of Mrs. Varinder Kaur has been reviewed. She is hereby informed that she is placed on Probation as a Clerk in the salary scale of Rs. 975-25-1150/EB-30-1660 with a basic start of Rs. 975/- p.m. The appointment shall be governed by the following terms and conditions:

1. The appointment is on Probation for a period of one year with effect from 10th February, 1997.

2. The service conditions shall be governed by the school rules in force from time to time.

3. The staff is liable to be transferred to any branch run by Guru Harkrishan Public sc