SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 624

SUNIL GAUR, PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Bajrangi Nirala – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Aditya Vikram, Mr. Avinash
For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma

JUDGMENT :

1. Appellant was tried for committing murder of Kundan Verma, s/o Laxmi Prasad Bhagat, on the night intervening 9th/ 10th June, 2012, in a room of CPWD Horticulture Nursery, at Sadiq Nagar, New Delhi and upon conclusion of trial in FIR No.67/2012, registered at Police Station Defence Colony, New Delhi, he stands convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC vide judgment of 30th March, 2016 and vide order of 11th April, 2016, he has been sentenced to imprisonment for life.

2. The substratum of prosecution case, as noticed in the impugned judgment, is as under:-

Verily, on 09.06.2012, 5/6 persons were deputed to report to Munshi Ram in order to do some work in the park of Sadiq Nagar. However, the labours arrived late at about 01.00 P.M., or so and it was decided that the scheduled work shall be started tomorrow morning. Mushi Ram handed over the keys of the store room/rest room to that group so that they may stay there overnight and start their work early in the morning presumably due to the heat being at its peak in the month of June. When Munshi Ram arrived at the nursey on the next morning i.e. 10.06.2012, he found that the iron gate was locked. He was having a duplica





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top