SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 678

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Sanjeet Taneja – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kumar Taneja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pramod Kumar Ahuja, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. No.4236/2018 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. No.4238/2018 (for condonation of delay)

2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 25 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.107/2018 and C.M. No.4237/2018 (stay)

3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.10.2017 whereby trial court with respect to the subject suit for partition for two properties situated at Mumbai and Delhi has decreed the suit only as regards the Mumbai property by holding the appellant/plaintiff to be the half owner thereof but has dismissed the suit qua the second property by holding that the appellant/plaintiff has no co-ownership right in the property situated at Delhi being B-7/54/1, DDA Flats, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi.

4. The case set up by the appellant/plaintiff was that he was the owner of the Delhi property because this Delhi property was purchased by the respondent no.1/defendant no.1/father from the property which was owned by the appella






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top