SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 681

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Suman Goel – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Padam Jain, Adv. With Mr. Vinay Kumar Bhasin, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

C.M. No.3752/2018 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M.Nos.3755/2018 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 3754/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing)

2. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 215 days in filing and 10 days in re-filing the appeal are condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.98/2018 and C.M. No.3753/2018(stay)

3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 10.1.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.14.50 lacs along with interest at18% per annum.

4. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit for recovery of Rs.14.50 lacs along with interest at 18% per annum till realization by pleading that appellants/defendants who were husband and wife were given a friendly loan of Rs.14.50 lacs by means of cheques which were encashed in the account of the appellant no.1/defendant no.1. Since the appellants/defendants failed to repay the loan therefore after servi































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top