SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 691

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Beena Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Smriti Sangeeta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. B.K. Pal, Advocate with Mr. Natansh Kumar Pal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. No.10013/2018 (for condonation of delay) in RFA No. 262/2018

1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. No.10196/2018 (exemption) in RFA No.266/2018

2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. No.10195/2018 (condonation of delay) in RFA No. 266/2018

3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.262/2018 and C.M. No.10012/2018 (stay)

RFA No.266/2018 and C.M. Nos.10194/2018 (stay) & 10197/2018 (under Order XX Rule 6A(2) CPC)

4. These two Regular First Appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) have been filed against the impugned judgment of the trial court dated 30.10.2017. By the impugned judgment trial court has decided two suits. One suit is the suit filed by Smt. Smriti Sangeeta the respondent in RFA No.262/2018 and who is also respondent no.1 in RFA No.266/2018. This was a suit filed for possession, mesne profits etc pleading ownership of suit property in view of documentation executed in her favour by late Sh. Sudershan Kumar Maha






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top