VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Beena Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Smriti Sangeeta – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
C.M. No.10013/2018 (for condonation of delay) in RFA No. 262/2018
1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
C.M. stands disposed of.
C.M. No.10196/2018 (exemption) in RFA No.266/2018
2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
C.M. stands disposed of.
C.M. No.10195/2018 (condonation of delay) in RFA No. 266/2018
3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
C.M. stands disposed of.
RFA No.262/2018 and C.M. No.10012/2018 (stay)
RFA No.266/2018 and C.M. Nos.10194/2018 (stay) & 10197/2018 (under Order XX Rule 6A(2) CPC)
4. These two Regular First Appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) have been filed against the impugned judgment of the trial court dated 30.10.2017. By the impugned judgment trial court has decided two suits. One suit is the suit filed by Smt. Smriti Sangeeta the respondent in RFA No.262/2018 and who is also respondent no.1 in RFA No.266/2018. This was a suit filed for possession, mesne profits etc pleading ownership of suit property in view of documentation executed in her favour by late Sh. Sudershan Kumar Maha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.