SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 699

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Nitin Luthra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.B. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

C.M. Appl. No. 5706/2018 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. Appl. No. 5707- 08/2018 (for delays)

2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delays of 12 days in filing the appeal and 4 days in re- filing the appeal are condoned, subject to just exceptions.

C.Ms. stand disposed of.

RFA No. 169/2018 and C.M. Appl. No. 5705/2018 (for stay)

3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 6.9.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff by dismissing the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (7) CPC.

4. The facts of the case are that admittedly the appellant/defendant admits that he received a loan of Rs.15,00,000/- from the respondent/plaintiff in terms of cheque no. 377709 drawn on UCO Bank, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi dated 9.3.2016 for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- . It is also not disputed that the cheque was of the bank of the respondent/plaintiff and the amount was credited to the acc

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top