SANJIV KHANNA, PRATHIBA M.SINGH
NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
Nokia India Private Limited has filed the afore-stated writ petition praying for multifarious reliefs, albeit during the course of arguments primarily one contention was raised and argued; assessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2009-10 have abated as time barred.
2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in manufacture and sale of telecommunication handsets.
3. For the Assessment Year 2009-10, the petitioner filed its return on 30th September, 2009, declaring total income of Rs.826.92 crores. The return was selected for scrutiny and notice dated 9th September, 2010 under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (“Act”, for short) was issued.
4. As per the petitioner, assessment proceedings had remained dormant for nearly twenty eight months till notice dated 17th January, 2013 was issued. Petitioner was required to produce books of accounts for the first time on 28th February, 2013, barely a month before the expiry of time limit for passing the assessment order on 31st March, 2013. Petitioner submits that books of accounts and vouchers were voluminous (described as truck loads), and accordingly, the Assess
State of Punjab versus Shreyans Industries Ltd.
Kumar Jagdish Chandra Sinha versus Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal
State of Punjab versus Khemi Ram
Government Wood Works versus State of Kerala
Rajinder Nath versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Arun Kumar Aggarwal versus State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.