S.MURALIDHAR, I.S.MEHTA
Rohit @ Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Nct of Delhi – Respondent
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.
1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd August, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge –II (North-West) (“ASJ”), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.85/2013 arising out of FIR No.278/2011 registered at Police Station (“PS”) Adarsh Nagar convicting Rudramani @ Rukmani @ Guderia @ Rohit (Accused No.1 – “A-1') and both the Appellants Rohit Kumar @ Rahul (“A-2”) and Sunil (“A-3”) for the offences under Sections 392/34 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (“IPC”). By the same judgment A-1was additionally held guilty of the offence under Section 392 read with Section 397 and Section 302/34 IPC as well as Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act.
2. These two appeals by A-2 and A-3 are also directed against the order on sentence dated 3rd September, 2014 of the trial Court whereby each of the Appellants i.e. A-2 and A-3 were sentenced for the offence under Section 302 IPC to rigorous imprisonment (“RI”) for life with a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment (“SI”) f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.