SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 968

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Himanshu Foods Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. V.N. Chaturvedi
For the Respondent: Mr. Shalabh Gupta

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. Himanshu Foods Private Limited (hereinafter, ‘Plaintiff’) filed a suit for recovery of Rs.15,00,000/- under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, ‘CPC’). Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, ‘Defendant’) filed two applications for leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3 and under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The said applications were dismissed by the Trial court. Leave to defend was refused. The suit of the Plaintiff was decreed for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- with costs and pendente lite and future interest @ 18% per annum.

Plaintiff’s case

2. The Plaintiff claims to be a supplier of skimmed milk powder and allied products. The Defendants approached the Plaintiff for supply of the same. It was agreed that for the supplies made, invoices would be raised by the Plaintiff and payments would be made either through cash or by cheque at the time of delivery of the goods by the Defendants. Orders were placed from time to time by the Defendants and supply of the skimmed milk powder was made by the Plaintiff. Accordingly, vari





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top